Opinion
No. 20-CC-0818
11-18-2020
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS CIVIL Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
I agree with the per curiam. Despite the "agreement" between the parties, as found by the trial court and detailed in the per curiam, plaintiff's new counsel moved for a default judgment without notice to defendant, which constitutes "ill practices" and is a basis for nullification of judgment. La. C.C.P. art. 2004; Russell v. Ill. Central Gulf R.R., 96-2649 (La. 1/10/97), 686 So. 2d 817. In my view, seeking a default judgment without notice may, depending upon the facts, constitute violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including, inter alia, Rule 3.3(a) (candor toward the tribunal); Rule 3.4 (fairness to opposing party and counsel); and Rule 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice).