Praxair Tech., Inc. v. Air Liquide Large Indus. U.S. LP

Full title: PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant v. AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES U.S…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 2018

2017-1318 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2018)

Opinion

2017-1318 2017-1319

02-13-2018

PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant v. AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES U.S. LP, Appellee

GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN; CHRISTOPHER J. HARNETT, KEVIN VINCENT MCCARTHY, New York, NY. STEPHANIE DEBROW, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARK T. GARRETT; CHARLES BRUCE WALKER, JR., Houston, TX; JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Washington, DC; ALLEN E. WHITE, Air Liquide, Houston, TX.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-01071, IPR2015-01072.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN; CHRISTOPHER J. HARNETT, KEVIN VINCENT MCCARTHY, New York, NY. STEPHANIE DEBROW, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARK T. GARRETT; CHARLES BRUCE WALKER, JR., Houston, TX; JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Washington, DC; ALLEN E. WHITE, Air Liquide, Houston, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 13, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court