Opinion
June, 1932.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Liggett Co. v. Baldridge ( 278 U.S. 105), by which decision we feel bound, inasmuch as we find no facts or circumstances of substance differentiating the two cases. All concur, except Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for dismissal of the complaint upon the reasoning contained in the opinion of Lewis, J., in Hauges v. Lascoff ( 140 Misc. 811). [ 140 Misc. 211.]