From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pratt v. City of Phila.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 23, 2013
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-1346 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-1346

04-23-2013

RAYMOND S. PRATT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants' Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum dated April 23, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Document No. 82) is GRANTED.
2. The federal claims for unlawful seizure, malicious prosecution, and excessive force against Police Officers Brinson and Rios remain unaffected by this Order.
3. The common law assault, battery, false arrest, and malicious prosecution claims against Police Officers Brinson and Rios remain unaffected by this Order.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

Berle M. Schiller , J.


Summaries of

Pratt v. City of Phila.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 23, 2013
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-1346 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Pratt v. City of Phila.

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND S. PRATT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 23, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-1346 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)