From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pratt v. Albriton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2018
No. 4:16-CV-198-BR (E.D.N.C. Sep. 21, 2018)

Opinion

No. 4:16-CV-198-BR

09-21-2018

CONSTANCE PRATT, Plaintiff, v. RETHA ALBRITON, SOFIA ELLIS, KEISHA ADAMS, JANE DAWSON, MARGARET DIXON, and LINDA MIZELLE, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Decision by Court.

This action came before this Court for ruling as follows: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendations as its own. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is allowed. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Judgment Filed and Entered on September 21, 2018 with service on:
Constance Pratt, P.O. Box General Mail, Winston-Salem, NC 27102 (via US Mail)
Scott C. Hart (via Cm/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Date: September 21, 2018

PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK

/s/_________

Lauren Herrmann, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Pratt v. Albriton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2018
No. 4:16-CV-198-BR (E.D.N.C. Sep. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Pratt v. Albriton

Case Details

Full title:CONSTANCE PRATT, Plaintiff, v. RETHA ALBRITON, SOFIA ELLIS, KEISHA ADAMS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 21, 2018

Citations

No. 4:16-CV-198-BR (E.D.N.C. Sep. 21, 2018)

Citing Cases

Watkins v. Goodwin

The Complaint thus does not serve as an affidavit. See generally N.C. Gen. Stat. § 10B-3(1) (defining an…

Watkins v. Blackmon

Such certification is not the equivalent of a verification or affidavit, as it is not a certification that…