From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prater v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 19, 1980
618 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1980)

Summary

holding plaintiff's evidence in QTA case "sufficient to establish the promise to reconvey, and thus raise a claim for equitable title [under Georgia trust law] for jurisdictional purposes"

Summary of this case from Bank One Texas, Nat. Assoc. v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 79-2527.

May 19, 1980.

Thomas R. Burnside, Jr., Augusta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

William T. Moore, Jr., U.S. Atty., Savannah, Ga., Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., Anne S. Almy, James W. Moorman, Dept. of Justice, Appellate Sect., Land Natural Resources Div., Attys., Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.

Before GODBOLD, REAVLEY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion Feb. 20, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 612 F.2d 157)


We granted rehearing to dispose of the government's concern that our original opinion, Prater v. United States, 612 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1980), expands the scope of the waiver of sovereign immunity for "quiet title" suits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2409a (1976) to actions seeking reformation of a deed. We did not characterize Prater's suit as one in the nature of an action to reform a deed; that label was one affixed by the government. Id. at 159. The opinion clearly indicates that Prater asserted equitable title to the realty, under Georgia trust law, by virtue of Allen's promise of reconveyance. Prater's summary judgment proof (the depositions of Fred Prater and Allen as well as Allen's affidavit) was sufficient to establish the promise to reconvey, and thus raise a claim of equitable title for jurisdictional purposes. See Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731, 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009, 1010 n. 4, 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947); C. Wright A. Miller, Federal Practice Procedure § 1350 (1969). Because Prater claimed a right, title or interest in the property, section 2409a served as a waiver of sovereign immunity and the district court had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(f)(1976).


Summaries of

Prater v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 19, 1980
618 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1980)

holding plaintiff's evidence in QTA case "sufficient to establish the promise to reconvey, and thus raise a claim for equitable title [under Georgia trust law] for jurisdictional purposes"

Summary of this case from Bank One Texas, Nat. Assoc. v. U.S.

explaining that jurisdiction existed under the QTA where the plaintiff "asserted equitable title to the realty, under Georgia trust law" and the court was called upon to adjudicate whether the plaintiff, in fact, had such equitable title

Summary of this case from McMaster v. U.S.
Case details for

Prater v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES C. PRATER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 19, 1980

Citations

618 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

McKay v. U.S.

The premise of this argument is clearly at odds with the extensive authority discussed above, which plaintiff…

Cooper v. Kliebert

"The basic question is practicability of joinder, not number of interested persons per se. Practicability of…