See, e.g., Chennette v. Porch.com, Inc., 50 F.4th 1217, 1225 (9th Cir. 2022); Klassen v. Solid Quote LLC, 2023 WL 7544185, at *2 (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2023); Tsolumba v. SelectQuote Ins. Servs., 2023 WL 6146644, at *5 n.3 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 20, 2023); Escano v. RCI LLC, 2022 WL 17251273, at *16 (D.N.M. Nov. 28, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 34525 (D.N.M. Jan. 4, 2023); Powers v. One Techs., LLC, 2022 WL 2992881, at *3 (N.D. Tex. July 28, 2022); Barton v. Temescal Wellness, LLC, 525 F.Supp.3d 195, 202 (D. Mass. 2021); see also Murray v. Grocery Delivery E-Servs. USA Inc., 55 F.4th 340, 348 (1st Cir. 2022). However, Defendant contends that the FCC's interpretation of the TCPA is contrary to the statute's plain text.
In this procedural context, the Court should conclude that that Horton has alleged he is a “residential subscriber” for purposes of 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d). Powers v. One Tech., LLC, 2022 WL 2992881, at *2 (N.D. Tex. July 28, 2022) (Starr, J.). b. Factual allegations