From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Power Brake Equipment Company v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1970
427 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 23365.

May 8, 1970.

Robert I. Waxman (argued), Atty., Dept. of Justice, Johnnie W. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Washington, D.C., Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Jack C. Wong, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Portland, Or., for appellant.

William H. Kinsey (argued), of Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey Williamson, Warde H. Erwin, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before WRIGHT and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and BOLDT, District Judge.

The Honorable George H. Boldt, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.


Appellant, in the exercise of its expertise, followed the over-all judicial philosophy expressed in Campana Corporation v. Harrison, 114 F.2d 400 (7th Cir. 1940) and E. Albrecht Son, Inc. v. Landy, 114 F.2d 202 (8th Cir. 1940), for a great many years. On the record before us, we decline to distinguish those cases and thus permit appellant to abandon its own interpretation of the statute as applied to the appellee.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Power Brake Equipment Company v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1970
427 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Power Brake Equipment Company v. United States

Case Details

Full title:POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 8, 1970

Citations

427 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Western Pioneer, Inc. v. United States

Finally, Western Pioneer argues against deference on the ground the Coast Guard's prior interpretation of the…

Shakespeare Company v. United States

Taxpayer cites a number of cases which involved only Section 4216(b)(1), not Section 4216(b)(2). See Power…