From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 15, 2015
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02089 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02089

09-15-2015

SHANE POWELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers
OPINION AND ORDER

On August 25, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) recommending that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) be granted and that this action be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as unexhausted.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: September 15, 2015

s/James L. Graham

JAMES L. GRAHAM

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Powell v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 15, 2015
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02089 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Powell v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:SHANE POWELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 15, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02089 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2015)