Opinion
Nos. D072566 D073083.
09-05-2018
CLAUDIA POWELL, as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLES M. TAGAMI, Defendant and Appellant.
[Modification of opinion (26 Cal.App.5th 219; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]
THE COURT. — On the court's own motion, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.264(c)(1), the court issued an order modifying the opinion on August 31, 2018, which contained an error. That order is amended, and the opinion is modified as follows:
1. On page 22, the third sentence, not the second sentence, of the first full paragraph is deleted. [26 Cal.App.5th advance report, last par. on p. 234, continuing on p. 235, lines 4-6] The paragraph, as modified, shall read as follows:
"Before filing the petition for the Third Account with the court, attorney Thompson provided Charles with a complete accounting, formatted as required by the Probate Code. Thompson also provided information regarding accounts for the Trust assets. Attorney Thompson sought clarification of what documentation Charles wanted, noting his experience with responding to specific inquiries, but not wholesale demands for documents."
2. On page 22, [26 Cal.App.5th 235, advance report, fn. 5] footnote 5 is deleted.
3. On page 23, [26 Cal.App.5th 235, advance report, 3d full par., lines 1-2] the first sentence in the first full paragraph is deleted and the second sentence [26 Cal.App.5th 235, advance report, 3d full par., lines 3-4] is modified to read as follows:
"Even after receiving documents, Charles filed a supplemental objection, which with additional exhibits totaled more than 200 pages, and stated he still wanted more documentation."
There is no change in the judgment.