Summary
In Pound v. Pleister, 107 N.J. Eq. 577, we passed upon a very like problem concerning another lot of land in the same tract and decided that the relation of the land to the park, pleasure grounds and lake areas was such that the opinion of this court in Lennig v. Ocean City Association, supra, was controlling.
Summary of this case from Schweitzer v. AdamiOpinion
Argued May 26th, 1930.
Decided February 2d 1931.
Lennig v. Ocean City Association, 41 N.J. Eq. 606, followed.
On appeal from the court of chancery.
Mr. Earl A. Merrill, for the appellants.
No appearance, for the respondents.
This is an action for specific performance and the learned vice-chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint, from which decree so advised the complainant below appeals.
Without going into details it is sufficient to say that we conclude that the opinion of this court in Lennig v. Ocean City Association, 41 N.J. Eq. 606, is controlling and for that reason the decree below is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.