From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potter v. Williams

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 27, 2007
162 P.3d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. A132296 Department of Corrections.

Submitted on record and briefs April 6, 2007.

June 27, 2007.

Jacques Stewart Potter filed the briefs pro se.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael C. Livingston, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Judicial review of OAR 291-143-0010, OAR 291-143-0130, and OAR 291-143-0140 dismissed as moot. OAR 291-143-0005 (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0070 (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0080 (Sept 4, 1997); and OAR 291-143-0110 (Sept 11, 1995) held valid.


Petitioner challenges various Department of Corrections (DOC) administrative rules pursuant to ORS 183.400. Specifically, he challenges portions of rules relating to the conduct of religious activities in DOC institutions including OAR 291-143-0005(3) (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0010(5) and (7) to (9) (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0070(4) (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0080(5) (Sept 4, 1997); OAR 291-143-0110(1) (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0130 (Sept 11, 1995); and OAR 291-143-0140(1) to (4) (Sept 11, 1995). Petitioner asserts that the challenged rules violate ORS 179.750; the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 USC sections 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2000); and Article I, sections 2 and 3, of the Oregon Constitution and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Petitioner's challenges to portions of the September 11, 1995, versions of OAR 291-143-0010, OAR 291-143-0130, and OAR 291-143-0140 have been rendered moot by DOC's adoption, on December 18, 2006, of temporary rules amending those rules. We reject petitioner's challenges to the remaining rules without discussion.

Judicial review of OAR 291-143-0010, OAR 291-143-0130, and OAR 291-143-0140 dismissed as moot. OAR 291-143-0005 (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0070 (Sept 11, 1995); OAR 291-143-0080 (Sept 4, 1997); and OAR 291-143-0110 (Sept 11, 1995) held valid.


Summaries of

Potter v. Williams

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 27, 2007
162 P.3d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Potter v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Jacques Stewart POTTER, Petitioner, v. Max WILLIAMS, Director, Department…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

162 P.3d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
162 P.3d 338

Citing Cases

Peoples Loan Finance Corp v. Bell

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING. The plaintiff in error, both in his brief first filed in this court and in his…

Jones v. Brown

Patterson Co. v. Peoples Loan c. Co., 158 Ga. 503 (4) ( 123 S.E. 704). This court is divided on the question…