From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poth v. Poth

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 27, 2006
199 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 87563.

June 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Douglas R. Beach, Judge.

William Bernard Fortenbury, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Alan J. Steinberg, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.


[Editor's Note: This opinon is subject to modification or transfer to the superme court.]


ORDER


Margaret C. Poth and Daniel S. Poth ("Petitioners") appeal from the trial court's judgment granting Gregory E. Poth's Motion to Dismiss Petitioners motion to "Determine Amounts Due from [Gregory E. Poth]."

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court's judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Poth v. Poth

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 27, 2006
199 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Poth v. Poth

Case Details

Full title:Gregory E. POTH, Respondent, v. Margaret C. POTH and Daniel S. Poth…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 27, 2006

Citations

199 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)