From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Posnir v. Rostof Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

February, 1911.


Order of the Municipal Court of October 13, 1910, setting aside the verdict and ordering a new trial affirmed. Order of October 31, 1910, reducing the amount of the costs to be paid as a condition of granting such new trial reversed, upon the ground that one judge of the Municipal Court had no power to review the order of another judge of said court in this regard. As defendants have not appealed from so much of the order of October thirteenth as imposed costs as a condition, we cannot review the correctness of such decision. No costs should be awarded to either party as against the other upon these appeals. Jenks, P.J., Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Posnir v. Rostof Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Posnir v. Rostof Company

Case Details

Full title:Morris Posnir, Appellant, v. Rostof Company and Samuel Weinberg…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1911

Citations

143 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)