From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Posilero v. L. A. Superior Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 16, 2023
22-cv-09205-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-09205-WHO

03-16-2023

DIONISIO D. POSILERO, Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE RE: DKT. NO. 11

William H. Orrick United States District Judge

On February 17, 2023, Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that this pro se case be dismissed as plaintiff's claims regarding proceedings and rulings made in Los Angeles Superior Court are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and plaintiff's complaint regarding a prejudicial and unhelpful letter from an employee working for the Los Angeles County Treasurer & Tax Collector failed to state a federal claim that could confer jurisdiction over this matter. Dkt. No. 11.

Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by March 3, 2023. As of today's date, no response to the Report and Recommendation has been filed.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the full record of this case (including correspondence from plaintiff that were received prior to Judge Westmore issuing her Report and Recommendation, Dkt. Nos., 7, 9, 10), I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in full and DISMISS this case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Posilero v. L. A. Superior Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 16, 2023
22-cv-09205-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Posilero v. L. A. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:DIONISIO D. POSILERO, Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 16, 2023

Citations

22-cv-09205-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)