From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portrait Displays, Inc. v. Speece

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Sep 3, 2004
C-04-1501 RMW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2004)

Opinion

          Christopher L. Wanger, Ryan S. Hilbert, Counsel for Plaintiff.

          Michael Timothy Welch, Counsel for Defendant(s).


          ORDER DISMISSING SPEECE'S FOURTH, FIFTH AND SIXTH COUNTERCLAIMS AND SALDANHA'S FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD COUNTERCLAIMS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

          RONALD WHYTE, District Judge.

         Defendant Entech Taiwan ("Entech") filed a motion to dismiss the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Claims for relief of Bryan Speece's counterclaims and the First, Second and Third Claims for relief of Ashley Saldanha's counterclaims. Speece and Saldanha filed a non-opposition and request leave to amend. A party may amend once as a matter of course. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Accordingly, the request for leave to amend is GRANTED. Speece and Saldanha have 21 days from the date of this order to file amended counterclaims.

         Each party's counsel is responsible for ensuring that co-counsel receives a copy of this order if co-counsel has not registered for e-filing pursuant to the court's CM/ECF program.


Summaries of

Portrait Displays, Inc. v. Speece

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Sep 3, 2004
C-04-1501 RMW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2004)
Case details for

Portrait Displays, Inc. v. Speece

Case Details

Full title:PORTRAIT DISPLAYS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BRYAN SPEECE, ASHLEY SALDANHA and…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Sep 3, 2004

Citations

C-04-1501 RMW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2004)