From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portman v. Burack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1942
265 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

December 22, 1942.


Appeal from an order denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order of the City Court of Mount Vernon reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The complaint does not contain facts sufficient to show that, if defendants had not interfered, plaintiff would have earned a commission. ( Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier, 263 N.Y. 386, 401.) The words "that the plaintiff's negotiations proceeded to a point where a contract of sale would probably have resulted, except for the conduct of the defendants, hereinafter described" are not sufficient even if the word "probably" had been omitted. They are merely a statement of a conclusion. If facts were stated showing that negotiations between plaintiff and defendants had reached a stage as a result of which plaintiff would have earned a commission if it were not for the alleged deceit of defendants, a cause of action would have been stated. ( Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier, supra; Skene v. Carayanis, 103 Conn. 708.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Portman v. Burack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1942
265 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Portman v. Burack

Case Details

Full title:HARRIET PORTMAN, Respondent, v. ISRAEL BURACK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Williams Co. v. Collins Tuttle Co.

" (Emphasis in original.) (For collected relevant cases, see 99 A.L.R. 20-21; but see, also, Portman v.…

Spitzer v. Sachar

It cannot be said here, as was stated by the court in Newberry Co. v. Warnecke Co. ( 267 App. Div. 418, 420)…