From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portillo v. King of Pita Bakery, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
Jul 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12cv1103 (E.D. Va. Jul. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12cv1103

07-09-2013

MARIA ISABEL SERVELLON PORTILLO, Plaintiff, v. KING OF PITA BAKERY, INC., ANTOINE BOULOS TAHAN, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

Upon consideration of the June 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge designated to conduct a hearing in this matter, no objections having been filed, and upon an independent de novo review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court adopts as its own the findings of fact and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, as set forth in the June 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that judgment is ENTERED by default in favor of plaintiff Maria Isabel Servellon Portillo and against defendants King of Pita Bakery, Inc. and Antoine Boulos Tahan, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $34,775.90.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in accordance with this Order, pursuant to Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P., and to place this matter among the ended causes.

The Clerk is further DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to defendants, the Magistrate Judge and all counsel of record. Alexandria, VA
July 9, 2013

______________________

T. S. Ellis, III

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Portillo v. King of Pita Bakery, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
Jul 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12cv1103 (E.D. Va. Jul. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Portillo v. King of Pita Bakery, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA ISABEL SERVELLON PORTILLO, Plaintiff, v. KING OF PITA BAKERY, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division

Date published: Jul 9, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12cv1103 (E.D. Va. Jul. 9, 2013)

Citing Cases

Seagram v. David's Towing & Recovery, Inc.

To establish a claim for nonpayment of minimum wages under 29 U.S.C. § 206, a plaintiff's complaint must show…

Priest v. DBI Servs.

Accordingly, the Court does not consider them in this Report and Recommendation. See Portillo v. King of Pita…