Portillo v. Adams

Full title: EDWARD PORTILLO, Petitioner, v. DARREL G. ADAMS, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

CV 09-5630 VAP (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

EDWARD PORTILLO, Petitioner, v. DARREL G. ADAMS, Respondent. No. CV 09-5630 VAP (MRW) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 20, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.