Opinion
Argued June 8, 1892
Decided October 1, 1892
Samuel Blythe Rogers for appellants.
James B. Ludlow for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Porth v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 1, 1892
134 N.Y. 615 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Porth v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 1, 1892
134 N.Y. 615 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Porth v. Manhattan Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:EMMA A. PORTH, Respondent, v . THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 1, 1892
Citations
134 N.Y. 615 (N.Y. 1892)
47 N.Y. St. Rptr. 929
Citing Cases
Altschul v. Ludwig
It has been held by this court that where a statute authorizing an elevated railroad company to build a…