From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Shoe Show, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
Dec 12, 2005
Civil Action No. 2:04CV124-P-B (N.D. Miss. Dec. 12, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:04CV124-P-B.

December 12, 2005

Kimberly Sands Coggin, Counsel for Defendants.

Robert Tyner (with permission), Counsel for Plaintiff.


AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


CAME BEFORE THE COURT, the joint ore tenus motion of all the Parties to this Action, for entry of this Agreed Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice. The Parties have represented to the Court that they have compromised and settled all of Plaintiff's claims in this suit to their respective satisfaction. Accordingly, this Court finds that the motion for entry of a judgment of dismissal with prejudice is well-taken.

WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:

(1) All of Plaintiff's claims which were asserted, or which could have been asserted, in this Action are dismissed with prejudice;

(2) This Court maintains jurisdiction over this matter for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement between the Parties, which is hereby incorporated by reference; and

(3) Each Party shall bear his, her or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees; Defendant Shoe Show shall pay costs of mediation.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Porter v. Shoe Show, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
Dec 12, 2005
Civil Action No. 2:04CV124-P-B (N.D. Miss. Dec. 12, 2005)
Case details for

Porter v. Shoe Show, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN PORTER, Plaintiff v. SHOE SHOW, INC. d/b/a THE SHOE DEPARTMENT and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division

Date published: Dec 12, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:04CV124-P-B (N.D. Miss. Dec. 12, 2005)