From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Northeast Guidance Ctr.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 20, 2002
467 Mich. 901 (Mich. 2002)

Opinion

No. 120614 (145).

November 20, 2002.


COA: 213190, Wayne CC: 96-602956-NI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we MODIFY the October 5, 2001 judgment of the Court of Appeals, and REMAND to the Wayne Circuit Court for a new trial on all issues. A new trial limited to the issue of damages is disfavored unless the defendant's liability is clear. Trapp v King, 374 Mich. 608, 611 (1965), Bias v Ausbury, 369 Mich. 378, 383 (1963). In this case, defendants' liability is not clear, nor is it clear that plaintiff's decedent was not comparatively negligent.

The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is also considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., would reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated by the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeals.


Summaries of

Porter v. Northeast Guidance Ctr.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 20, 2002
467 Mich. 901 (Mich. 2002)
Case details for

Porter v. Northeast Guidance Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:SABRINA E. PORTER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Irvin…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 20, 2002

Citations

467 Mich. 901 (Mich. 2002)
653 N.W.2d 183