From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Port of New York Authority v. Elman

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan
Sep 12, 1949
196 Misc. 91 (N.Y. Mun. Ct. 1949)

Opinion

September 12, 1949.

Leander I. Shelley, Nathaniel Fensterstock and Albert D. Jordan for plaintiff appearing specially.

Israel Machtey for defendants.


Upon the foregoing papers this motion is granted. The counterclaim is dismissed on the ground that on the face thereof the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter. The plaintiff by commencing this action has appeared generally. This general appearance, however, does not deprive it of the right to attack the counterclaim (which is in the nature of an original action) for want of jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, which objection can be raised at any stage of the action. Nor may such an appearance be construed as a waiver of plaintiff's immunity from suit as a governmental agency.


Summaries of

Port of New York Authority v. Elman

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan
Sep 12, 1949
196 Misc. 91 (N.Y. Mun. Ct. 1949)
Case details for

Port of New York Authority v. Elman

Case Details

Full title:PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT ELMAN et al., Copartners…

Court:Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan

Date published: Sep 12, 1949

Citations

196 Misc. 91 (N.Y. Mun. Ct. 1949)
92 N.Y.S.2d 115

Citing Cases

Marmor v. Port of N.Y. Authority

The recently enacted law of New York (L. 1950, ch. 301) and the later enactment by the State of New Jersey of…

Marmor v. Port of NY Auth.

The recently enacted law of New York (L. 1950, ch. 301) and the later enactment by the State of New Jersey of…