Porras v. Tempest Recovery

Full title: PRISCILLA PORRAS APPELLANT v. TEMPEST RECOVERY SERVICES, APPELLEE INC…

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Sep 11, 2008

No. 02-08-002-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. 02-08-002-CV.

DELIVERED: September 11, 2008.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County.

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ¹

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM.

On July 22, 2008, we notified Appellant Priscilla Porras that her brief did not comply with rules 9.4(h) and 38.1(a) — (j) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.² On August 12, 2008, we notified Appellant that her amended brief did not comply with rules 9.4(h) and 38.1(a), (d), (f), (g), (h), and (j).³ We allowed Appellant until August 22, 2008 to file a second amended brief that complied with the above rules. We stated in our letter to Appellant that her failure to do so would result in our striking her brief and dismissing her appeal for want of prosecution.⁴ On August 25, 2008, we received Appellant's second amended brief. It does not comply with rules 38.1(a), (d), (f), and (h).⁵

2 See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(h), 38.1(a) — (j).

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(h), 38.1(a), (d), (f), (g), (h), (j).

4 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3.

5 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (d), (f), (h).

Accordingly, we strike Appellant's brief and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.⁶

6 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c).