From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porchia v. Gower

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-0021 JAM AC (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-0021 JAM AC (TEMP) P

02-22-2016

LEROY PORCHIA, Petitioner, v. GOWER, Respondent.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 7, 2016, this court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and granted him thirty days leave to file an amended petition. That thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that ///// failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 22, 2016

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Porchia v. Gower

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-0021 JAM AC (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Porchia v. Gower

Case Details

Full title:LEROY PORCHIA, Petitioner, v. GOWER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-0021 JAM AC (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2016)