From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poppington, LLC v. Brooks

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 1, 2021
20-cv-8616 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-8616 (JSR)

07-01-2021

POPPINGTON, LLC and RAQUEL HORN, Plaintiffs, v. EDYWNA BROOKS and JOHN DOE 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant Edwyna Brooks to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5), for insufficient service of process under Rule 12(b)(2), and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). Upon consideration, the motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b) (2) and Rule 12(b) (5) are denied. A memorandum explaining the reason for this ruling will issue in due course.

In addition, the Court will hear telephonic oral argument on the motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) (6) on July 13, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. The dial-in information will be docketed in due course.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Poppington, LLC v. Brooks

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 1, 2021
20-cv-8616 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Poppington, LLC v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:POPPINGTON, LLC and RAQUEL HORN, Plaintiffs, v. EDYWNA BROOKS and JOHN DOE…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

20-cv-8616 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2021)