From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poplin v. Lexington County Detention Center

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division
Jul 12, 2010
C.A. No. 8:10-1311-HMH-BHH (D.S.C. Jul. 12, 2010)

Opinion

C.A. No. 8:10-1311-HMH-BHH.

July 12, 2010


OPINION ORDER


This matter is before the court with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 of the District of South Carolina. Michael Poplin ("Poplin"), a state detainee proceeding pro se, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging various violations to his civil rights. In her Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Hendricks recommends partially dismissing the complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to Lexington County Detention Center only. (Report and Recommendation 4.)

The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility for making a final determination remains with the United States District Court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the magistrate judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006).

Poplin filed objections to the Report and Recommendation identifying Jame Mett and Major Queggs, the Lexington County Detention Center curator, as proper defendants in this case. The court construes Poplin's objection as a request to amend his complaint and grants this request. The court dismisses Lexington County Detention Center as a defendant. Based on the foregoing, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Hendricks' Report and Recommendation.

The court believes that the proper spelling is James Metts.

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to Lexington County Detention Center only. It is further

ORDERED that Poplin's request to amend his complaint to add Jame Mett and Major Queggs as defendants is granted and this case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further consideration.

Id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Poplin v. Lexington County Detention Center

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division
Jul 12, 2010
C.A. No. 8:10-1311-HMH-BHH (D.S.C. Jul. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Poplin v. Lexington County Detention Center

Case Details

Full title:Michael Poplin, Plaintiff, v. Lexington County Detention Center, and…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division

Date published: Jul 12, 2010

Citations

C.A. No. 8:10-1311-HMH-BHH (D.S.C. Jul. 12, 2010)