From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pope v. Thomas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
23-cv-00328-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-00328-CRB (PR)

05-29-2024

JACOBY N. POPE, V71862, Plaintiff, v. M. THOMAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge

On April 3, 2024, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the operative complaint in this prisoner action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with partial “leave to amend to set forth specific facts in support of viable Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claims” against five of the named defendants - Bangar, Soto, Thomas, Ramirez-Ruiz and Quiroz - “if possible.” ECF No. 20 at 9. The court made clear that failure to file a proper amended complaint within 28 days “will result in the dismissal of this action.” Id. at 10.

More than 50 days have passed since the court's April 3, 2024 order and plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor sought an extension of time to do so. This action accordingly is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The clerk is directed to close the case and terminate all pending motions as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pope v. Thomas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
23-cv-00328-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Pope v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:JACOBY N. POPE, V71862, Plaintiff, v. M. THOMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 29, 2024

Citations

23-cv-00328-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)