From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pope v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 30, 2004
No. C 04-0346 CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2004)

Opinion

No. C 04-0346 CRB (PR)

January 30, 2004


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Petitioner, a detainee facing ongoing state criminal proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Alameda, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that repeated interference with his "legal mail" is negatively affecting his right to a fair trial in state court. He seeks "to be released from jail."

Petitioner may challenge his pre-sentence detention on state criminal charges by way of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. However, principles of comity and federalism require that this court abstain and not entertain any such pre-sentence habeas challenge unless petitioner shows that: (1) he has exhausted available state judicial remedies, and (2) "special circumstances" warrant federal intervention. Carden v. Montana, 626 F.2d 82, 83-84 (9th Cir. 1980). Only in cases of proven harassment or prosecutions undertaken by state officials in bad faith without hope of obtaining a valid conviction and perhaps in other special circumstances where irreparable injury can be shown is federal injunctive relief against pending state prosecutions appropriate. Id. at 84 (citing Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 85 (1971)). Petitioner makes no such showing of "special circumstances" warranting federal intervention. See id. The petition accordingly is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after state criminal proceedings, including appeal, are completed.

To whatever extent petitioner seeks damages for denial of access to the courts, he must file a separate civil rights action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He is advised that he will generally be precluded from stating such a claim because he is represented by counsel in the ongoing state criminal proceedings, however. Cf United States v. Wilson, 690 F.2d 1267, 1272 (9th Cir. 1982) (mere offer of court-appointed counsel satisfies government's obligation to provide pre-trial detainee meaningful access to the courts).

The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions as moot. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pope v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 30, 2004
No. C 04-0346 CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2004)
Case details for

Pope v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. POPE, Petitioner, vs. ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF's DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 30, 2004

Citations

No. C 04-0346 CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2004)