From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pentair Water Pool & Spa, Inc. v. Hayward Indus., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 15, 2017
2016-2598 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2598

08-15-2017

PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC., Appellant v. HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee

DAVID JAMES CUSHING, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARK BOLAND, RAJA N. SALIBA, GRANT SIMON SHACKELFORD. STEVEN HALPERN, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by SCOTT S. CHRISTIE, TIMOTHY PATRICK HOMLISH, MARK NIKOLSKY, MATTHEW ADAM SKLAR; LEE CARL BROMBERG, Boston, MA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,005.

JUDGMENT

DAVID JAMES CUSHING, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARK BOLAND, RAJA N. SALIBA, GRANT SIMON SHACKELFORD. STEVEN HALPERN, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by SCOTT S. CHRISTIE, TIMOTHY PATRICK HOMLISH, MARK NIKOLSKY, MATTHEW ADAM SKLAR; LEE CARL BROMBERG, Boston, MA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 15, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Pentair Water Pool & Spa, Inc. v. Hayward Indus., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 15, 2017
2016-2598 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Pentair Water Pool & Spa, Inc. v. Hayward Indus., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC., Appellant v. HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 15, 2017

Citations

2016-2598 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)