From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ponzi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1945
269 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

October 15, 1945.


Order directing the examination of plaintiff by a neurologist reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term. Section 306 of the Civil Practice Act does not contemplate the adoption by the court of the nominee of any party. Close, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ponzi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1945
269 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Ponzi v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS PONZI, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Swiatlowski v. Kasprzyk

The practice is quite common for the court to designate the physician suggested by the defendant but the…

Rooney v. Colson

The statute, by its terms, requires that the physical examination be made by a physician "to be designated by…