From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pontieri v. State Farm Insurance Companies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1996
225 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 28, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kenneth Molloy, J.).


In light of the unambiguous "Definitions" and "Exclusions" provisions in the homeowner's insurance policy, defendant State Farm properly disclaimed coverage of claims arising from the instant moped accident, which occurred on a public road. The moped is clearly a "motor vehicle" under the policy; it was owned by plaintiffs; and while it may have been in "dead storage" prior to the accident, it certainly was in operation at the time of the accident ( see, Lee v Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 178 F.2d 750; cf., Sharpe v State Farm Fire Cas. Co., 558 F. Supp. 10). We also note that under the subject insurance policy, the factual issue of whether or not the moped was operated with the permission or consent of the owner is immaterial to determination of State Farm's obligations to plaintiff in these circumstances.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Pontieri v. State Farm Insurance Companies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1996
225 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Pontieri v. State Farm Insurance Companies

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. PONTIERI, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 386

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. Progressive Direct Insurance Co.

Conversely, the defendant cites to a number of cases which purport to hold that a motor vehicle is not an…