From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ponisciak v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 14, 2012
No. 10-4232 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-4232

03-14-2012

JOSEPH PONISCIAK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


CIVIL ACTION

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the "Complainant's Reply Brief in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 21), which is being treated as a Motion for Reconsideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT

_______________

ROBERT F. KELLY

SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

Ponisciak v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 14, 2012
No. 10-4232 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Ponisciak v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH PONISCIAK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

No. 10-4232 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Allgyer

"A motion to reconsider judgment is not a 'means to reargue matters already argued and disposed of or as an…