From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollock v. San Diego Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 30, 2024
24-cv-0795-BAS-BLM (S.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-0795-BAS-BLM

07-30-2024

LUKE POLLOCK, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF NO. 2)

HON. CYNTHIA BASHANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Luke Pollock's motion requesting leave to file electronically using PACER-CM/ECF. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff notes he resides in Los Angeles such that it is burdensome to travel to the Southern District of California to submit papers for this matter. Plaintiff, however, fails to state he has the necessary equipment and capabilities to electronically file documents or that he can ensure his compliance with ECF Administrative Policies and Procedures. Cf. In re Cisse, No. 20-CV-01694-BAS-WVG, 2020 WL 6561426, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2020).

The Court therefore DENIES Plaintiff's motion. This decision is made without prejudice, and Plaintiff may renew his motion with additional information regarding his capacity to file electronically and his compliance with ECF Administrative Policies and Procedures. Additionally, the Court notes Plaintiff can file motions and associated papers with the Court via mail service if he chooses not to renew his motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pollock v. San Diego Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 30, 2024
24-cv-0795-BAS-BLM (S.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Pollock v. San Diego Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:LUKE POLLOCK, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jul 30, 2024

Citations

24-cv-0795-BAS-BLM (S.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)