From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollard v. Frank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 14, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-288 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-288

09-14-2015

MARY POLLARD, Plaintiff, v. TONYA FRANK, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on September 8, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the above-captioned action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. September 14, 2015

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pollard v. Frank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 14, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-288 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Pollard v. Frank

Case Details

Full title:MARY POLLARD, Plaintiff, v. TONYA FRANK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Sep 14, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-288 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 14, 2015)