From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollard v. Autotote, LTD

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 18, 1988
872 F.2d 1131 (3d Cir. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1691.

Argued April 14, 1988.

Decided July 18, 1988. As Amended April 26, 1989.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 86-6555); James T. Giles, Judge.

Before HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion filed July 18, 1988, 852 F.2d 67, be amended as follows:

Page 70, footnote 2, line 8 which reads: ". . . expressly exempt from ERISA's coverage. See 29 U.S.C. § 1051(2)."

shall read: ". . . expressly exempt from ERISA's vesting requirements. See 29 U.S.C. § 1051(2)."


Summaries of

Pollard v. Autotote, LTD

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 18, 1988
872 F.2d 1131 (3d Cir. 1988)
Case details for

Pollard v. Autotote, LTD

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD C. POLLARD, APPELLANT, v. AUTOTOTE, LTD

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 18, 1988

Citations

872 F.2d 1131 (3d Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

W. R. Berkley Corp. v. Dunai

We previously anticipated that Delaware courts would examine forfeiture-for-competition provisions under the…

LKQ Corp. v. Rutledge

Id. at —, 2024 WL 315193 at *1. And when discussing how jurisdictions approach forfeiture provisions, the…