Opinion
No. 66907
07-22-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This amended pro se petition for writ relief challenges the district court's findings and decisions in the context of an appeal from a justice court order and the constitutionality of two justice court rules.
The clerk of this court shall file the amended petition, provisionally received in this court on June 4, 2015. --------
Having reviewed the petition, which was filed without any supporting documents, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; NRAP 21(a)(4); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991). We therefore deny the petition. NRAP 21(b).
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge
Renard Truman Polk
Attorney General/Carson City
Pershing County Clerk