From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polk v. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00728-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00728-AWI-BAM PC

01-22-2013

SUSAN MAE POLK, Plaintiff, v. PITTMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR COPY OF

COURT DOCKET TO PREPARE

DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL


(ECF No. 55.)

Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a notice of interlocutory appeal. (ECF No. 54.) Plaintiff also filed the instant motion for a copy of the court docket to prepare the designation of record for her appeal. (ECF No. 55.)

Plaintiff's request is moot. On December 27, 2012, the Clerk of the Court processed the interlocutory appeal and issued a certificate of record. The certificate clearly states that the record in this case is available and will be transmitted to the Ninth Circuit upon the direction of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 56-2.) Accordingly, it is not necessary for Plaintiff to designate the record for appeal. Further, Plaintiff submitted an apparent designation of record on January 11, 2013. (ECF No. 58.) Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for a copy of the court docket to prepare a designation of the record for appeal is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Polk v. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00728-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Polk v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN MAE POLK, Plaintiff, v. PITTMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00728-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)