From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polk v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 10, 2023
No. 23-11912 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

23-11912

10-10-2023

ANGELENE POLK, Plaintiff, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM

Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge

Plaintiff Angelene Polk brings this case against her former employer, Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, alleging religious discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”) and Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”). The Court has federal question jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Title VII claims (Counts I and II), but Plaintiff's ELCRA claim (Count III) is based on state law. Because the parties in this case are nondiverse, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the ELCRA claim so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4); Moor v. Cty. of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 716 (1973); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F.Supp. 1309, 1315 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Thus, pursuant to § 1367(c), Plaintiff's state law claim in Count III of her complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will retain jurisdiction over Plaintiff's federal claims only.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Polk v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 10, 2023
No. 23-11912 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Polk v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELENE POLK, Plaintiff, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

No. 23-11912 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 10, 2023)