From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polito v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0431 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-0431 GEB CKD P

04-14-2016

CAREMEN POLITO, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On March 4, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this action within thirty days. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired and plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 14, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
poli0431.fifp


Summaries of

Polito v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0431 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Polito v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:CAREMEN POLITO, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 14, 2016

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-0431 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2016)