From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pointe Savings Bank v. Garshall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 26, 1993
610 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

Nos. 91-2205, 92-0136 and 92-0137.

December 23, 1992. Rehearing En Banc Denied January 26, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Edward Fine, J.

Frank J. Bennardo, Boca Raton, and Edna L. Caruso and Barbara J. Compiani of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Jerald A. Goldstein of Goldstein Saturn, Boca Raton, for appellee/cross-appellant.


The trial court found as a fact that under the terms of their commission agreement, the appellee-mortgage broker was only entitled to a commission from appellant if the loan applications that she originated were actually closed. Nevertheless, the trial court ordered the bank to pay commissions on loan applications which did not close. This was error, notwithstanding that only the bank was responsible for the decisions to reject those applications prior to closing on them. E.g. Harding Realty Inc. v. Turnberry Towers Corp., 436 So.2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Warter v. Bancroft Hotel Assocs., 285 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Hanover Realty Corp. v. Codomo, 95 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1957). Therefore, the final judgment and order regarding attorney's fees and costs are reversed.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and MOE, LEROY H., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Pointe Savings Bank v. Garshall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 26, 1993
610 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Pointe Savings Bank v. Garshall

Case Details

Full title:POINTE SAVINGS BANK, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. SARI GARSHALL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 26, 1993

Citations

610 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)