From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pogue v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
May 6, 2003
105 S.W.3d 847 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 80816

May 6, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Honorable Ben Burkemper.

Lee R. Elliott, Troy, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Victorine R. Mahon, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., George W. Draper, III, J., Booker T. Shaw, J.


[THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]


ORDER


Appellant Ronald Pogue ("Pogue") appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his petition for review of the Director of Revenue's revocation of his driver's license pursuant to Section 577.041, RSMo Supp. 2001. In his only point on appeal, Pogue argues the trial court erred in finding that he refused to submit to a urine test because the officer's requirement that Pogue produce the sample in front of him interfered with his ability to do so, was not a requirement under Section 577.026, RSMo 2000, and constituted an unlawful strip search.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pogue v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
May 6, 2003
105 S.W.3d 847 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Pogue v. Director of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:RONALD POGUE, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division

Date published: May 6, 2003

Citations

105 S.W.3d 847 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)