Tsipouras v. Tsipouras, 677 A.2d 493, 495 (Del.1996).Poe v. Poe, 2005 WL 1076524, at *2 (Del. May 6, 2005). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the Family Court abused its discretion in denying the Mother's motion to reopen the judgment dismissing her custody petition.
Tsipouras v. Tsipouras, 677 A.2d 493, 495 (Del. 1996). Poe v. Poe, 2005 WL 1076524, at *2 (Del. May 6, 2005). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the Family Court abused its discretion in denying the Mother's motion to reopen the judgment dismissing her custody petition.
The standard of review on a motion for re-argument is abuse of discretion. Poe v. Poe, 872 A.2d 960 (Del.2005); Lilly v. State, 649 A.2d 1055, 1059 (Del.1994). There was uncontradicted evidence in the record that Cohen had interfered with the Commissioner, and that Cohen had used IDG to do so. It was logical for the Court of Chancery to conclude that it was important to preserve the Sanctions Order to prevent Cohen from using IDG to interfere again.