From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Podkulski v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Oct 25, 2013
Civil No. 11-cv-102-JL (D.N.H. Oct. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-cv-102-JL

10-25-2013

Steve Podkulski v. Doe et al


ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated August 14, 2013. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.

_______________

Joseph N. Laplante

Chief Judge
cc: Steve Podkulski

John A. Curran, Esq.


Summaries of

Podkulski v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Oct 25, 2013
Civil No. 11-cv-102-JL (D.N.H. Oct. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Podkulski v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:Steve Podkulski v. Doe et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Oct 25, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 11-cv-102-JL (D.N.H. Oct. 25, 2013)

Citing Cases

Podkulski v. Balles

Podkulski's proposed complaint seeks to add claims to this action, denominated in Document No. 128 as…