Opinion
21 Civ. 4390 (VM) 21 Civ. 5658 (VM)
07-06-2021
PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. JULIAN KEIPPEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, U.S.D.J.
Upon review of the complaints and other papers filed with the Court in connection with the cases captioned above, the Court notes that in all material respects the papers describe substantially similar underlying events arising out of the same or similar operative facts, and that the parties are substantially the same parties. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to consolidate these actions for all pretrial purposes; and it is further
ORDERED that all filings in connection with the consolidated action be docketed against the lower numbered case, 21 Civ. 4390; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court close the referenced higher numbered case, 21 Civ. 5658, as a separate action and remove it from the Court's docket.
SO ORDERED: