Summary
In Plovie, the Court noted that the plaintiff's retaliation claim was undermined by the fact that the first two minor misconduct tickets were issued before the plaintiff engaged in the protected conduct.
Summary of this case from Campbell v. GauseOpinion
Case No. 2:05-cv-128.
October 3, 2006
ORDER AND JUDGMENT APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed August 31, 2006, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #27) is GRANTED and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for the reason(s) stated in the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Dkt. #37) is DENIED for the reason(s) stated in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon review of Plaintiff's claims, this Court can discern no good-faith basis for an appeal and so certifies in accordance with McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997).