From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plotkin v. Seiden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1996
233 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 4, 1996.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated September 13, 1995, which granted the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Before: Thompson, J.P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing that the defendants violated Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) and that such violations were contributing causes of the decedent's death ( see, Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513). In opposition to the motion, the defendants only submitted an affirmation of counsel which alleged in a conclusory fashion that issues of fact existed as to how the accident occurred and whether the defendants' Labor Law violations were a proximate cause of the death. This is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see, Smith v Board of Educ., 220 AD2d 362; Figueroa v Manhattanville Coll., 193 AD2d 778).


Summaries of

Plotkin v. Seiden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1996
233 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Plotkin v. Seiden

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL PLOTKIN, Respondent, v. JOEL SEIDEN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 820

Citing Cases

9394 LLC v. Farris

In opposition, the plaintiffs tendered only an affirmation of counsel who had no personal knowledge of the…