From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pleasant v. Fortner

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 12, 2005
Case No.: 3:05cv31/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 12, 2005)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:05cv31/RV/EMT.

October 12, 2005


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated September 12, 2005. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent's amended motion to dismiss (Doc. 21) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pleasant v. Fortner

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 12, 2005
Case No.: 3:05cv31/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 12, 2005)
Case details for

Pleasant v. Fortner

Case Details

Full title:BRETT TODD PLEASANT, #147394, Petitioner, v. THOMAS FORTNER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Oct 12, 2005

Citations

Case No.: 3:05cv31/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 12, 2005)