From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plaza v. N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 26, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4759 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-26

Mia PLAZA, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Claribel Rodriguez, Appellant, v. NEW YORK HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION (Jacobi Medical Center), Respondent.

Law Offices of Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, P.C., Yonkers (John M. Daly of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, P.C., Yonkers (John M. Daly of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The certified question should not be answered on the ground that it is unnecessary.

Plaintiff admittedly served a late notice of claim against defendant without seeking leave of court.

General Municipal Law § 50–e (1) requires that a claimant serve a notice of claim against a public corporation within 90 days after a tort claim arises. However, section 50–e (5) provides that a court, “in its discretion,” may grant an application extending the time to serve a notice of claim as long as the application is made within the limitations period for commencing the action, including any tolls or extensions. CPLR 208 provides that “[i]f a person entitled to commence an action is under a disability because of infancy ... at the time the cause of action accrues, and ... the time otherwise limited [for commencing the action] is less than three years, the time shall be extended by the period of disability.” Where a medical malpractice action accrues during infancy, the extension is limited to 10 years from the time of accrual ( seeCPLR 208). Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Plaza v. N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 26, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4759 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Plaza v. N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Mia PLAZA, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Claribel…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jun 26, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4759 (N.Y. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4759
970 N.Y.S.2d 923
993 N.E.2d 409

Citing Cases

Williams v. Graf

Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc., 31 A.D.3d 319, 326 (1st Dep't 2006), aff'd, 8 N.Y.3d 931 (2007). See…

T.V. v. N.Y.C. Health & Hosps. Corp.

In deciding whether to grant an extension of time to serve the notice of claim under General Municipal Law §…