From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plaisance v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jan 8, 2003
No. 04-02-00510-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2003)

Opinion

No. 04-02-00510-CR.

Delivered and Filed January 8, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH.

From the 155th Judicial District Court, Waller County, Texas, Trial Court No. 00-02-10,151. AFFIRMED.

Before Justices DUNCAN, ANGELINI and MARION.


A jury found defendant, Jereamie Plaisance, guilty of indecency with a child and assessed punishment at five years probation and a $500 fine. Appellant's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant was informed of his right to review the record. Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief. Appellant has not filed a brief. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).


Summaries of

Plaisance v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jan 8, 2003
No. 04-02-00510-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2003)
Case details for

Plaisance v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jereamie PLAISANCE, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jan 8, 2003

Citations

No. 04-02-00510-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2003)